1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2010 Nissan Armada is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2010 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Armada |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3129 mm |
