1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford 12 M | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Ford | Dodge |
| Model | 12 M | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6350 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3052 mm |
