1955 Ford 12 M vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (237 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford 12 M | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | XF |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2909 mm |