1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 340 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Crestline | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4453 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
