1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 440 kg more than 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 1985 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Crestline | Sigma |
Year Released | 1955 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4453 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2520 mm |