1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 180 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 1996 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Crestline | Megane |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3643 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2490 mm |
