1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1996 Volvo 850 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 175 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Crestline | 850 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4453 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2670 mm |