1955 Ford Crestline vs. 1999 Opel Meriva
To start off, 1999 Opel Meriva is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 120 kg more than 1999 Opel Meriva.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 1999 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Crestline | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4453 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2610 mm |
