1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 322 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Crestline | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4453 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1832 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2760 mm |