1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2003 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln LS weights approximately 215 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 2003 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Crestline | LS |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3643 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2910 mm |
