1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 78 kg more than 2004 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |