1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2005 Kia Shuma
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 380 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2005 Kia Shuma | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Crestline | Shuma |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2570 mm |