1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2008 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Mazda Tribute is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2008 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | Tribute |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2630 mm |