1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Crestline | LR2 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |