1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 215 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Crestline | Equator |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4453 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3560 mm |
