1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 335 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Crestline | XF |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4453 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2908 mm |