1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Crestline | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Crestline | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3643 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1821 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |