1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 180 kg more than 2012 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2012 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Crestline | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4453 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3710 mm |
