1955 Ford Crestline vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Crestline | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Crestline | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3643 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1897 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2860 mm |
