1955 Ford F vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1955 Ford F is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1955 Ford F. (156 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 180 kg more than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford F has manual transmission. 1955 Ford F will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford F | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3690 mm |
