1955 Ford F vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1983 Lincoln Continental is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford F would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford F should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 440 kg more than 1983 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford F | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | F | Continental |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 4940 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |
