1955 Ford F vs. 1996 Rover 600
To start off, 1996 Rover 600 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Rover 600. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford F should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 785 kg more than 1996 Rover 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford F | 1996 Rover 600 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F | 600 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4458 cc | 1850 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |