1955 Ford F vs. 2000 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2000 Mazda B2500 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford F should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Mazda B2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford F. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford F | 2000 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2990 mm |
