1955 Ford F vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1955 Ford F. (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 490 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1955 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford F | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F | 6 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 2486 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |
