1955 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 68 kg more than 1955 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1955 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Fairlane | Sable |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4785 cc | 2985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1588 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2870 mm |