1955 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 94 kg more than 1955 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Fairlane | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Fairlane | Compass |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1614 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2640 mm |
