1955 Ford Popular vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Popular would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford Popular is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Popular. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Popular | 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Popular | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
