1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1955 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 506 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Thunderbird | FX |
Year Released | 1955 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4785 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |