1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 570 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |
