1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1979 Zastava 132
To start off, 1979 Zastava 132 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 415 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1979 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Thunderbird | 132 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1754 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |
