1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1990 Rover Metro

To start off, 1990 Rover Metro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1990 Rover Metro. (95 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1990 Rover Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 591 kg more than 1990 Rover Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: