1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 320 kg more than 1955 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Challenger |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |