1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 25 kg more than 1998 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | 75 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |