1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 510 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | Midge |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 209 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
