1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 575 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Thunderbird | Clio |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2770 mm |
