1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4785 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |