1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1955 Ford Thunderbird. (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 68 kg more than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Because 2009 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | Murano |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |