1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Thunderbird | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |