1955 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 40 kg more than 1955 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1955 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | C-Max |
Year Released | 1955 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2788 mm |