1955 Ford Vedette vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Vedette would be higher. At 2,158 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Vedette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 2 (73 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1955 Ford Vedette. (66 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford Vedette.
Because 1955 Ford Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Ford Vedette (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Ford Vedette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Vedette | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Vedette | 2 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2158 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |
