1955 GAZ M-20 vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1955 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1955 GAZ M-20.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 GAZ M-20 | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | GAZ | Nissan |
| Model | M-20 | NP300 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2960 mm |
