1955 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 360 kg more than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Hudson Metropolitan | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
Model | Metropolitan | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2550 mm |