1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1964 MG 1100 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Humber Super Snipe | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Humber | MG |
Model | Super Snipe | 1100 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2380 mm |