1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1966 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Humber Super Snipe | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Humber | Suzuki |
Model | Super Snipe | Fronte |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |