1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1969 Volvo 120
To start off, 1969 Volvo 120 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 120. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 860 kg more than 1969 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Humber Super Snipe | 1969 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Super Snipe | 120 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |
