1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 924 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Humber Super Snipe | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Super Snipe | Midge |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
