1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 495 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Humber Super Snipe | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Humber | Volvo |
Model | Super Snipe | V40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |