1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2003 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volkswagen Polo (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 735 kg more than 2003 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Humber Super Snipe 2003 Volkswagen Polo
Make Humber Volkswagen
Model Super Snipe Polo
Year Released 1955 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4138 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1890 kg 1155 kg
Vehicle Length 5050 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 45 L