1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 386 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Humber Super Snipe | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Humber | Mercury |
Model | Super Snipe | Sable |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 201 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |