1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 140 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Humber Super Snipe 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
Make Humber Chevrolet
Model Super Snipe Cobalt
Year Released 1955 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4138 cc 2201 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 3400 RPM 6100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1890 kg 1750 kg
Vehicle Length 5050 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 49 L